Behind the curtain spin diplomatic and political battle is very sharp, and heated to a certain extent between Jordan and Israel, the primary objectives of the Tel Aviv entitled visible and invisible from behind the continuous tampering Jordanian most sensitive file, and headline religious jurisdiction over Al-Aqsa Mosque.
Throughout the past two weeks scrutinizes Jordan Enterprise in the information, looking for ratings and then answers relatively confused question now titled the justification and rationale for the Israeli tampering in the "Jordanian dish", this time where he learned Tel Aviv to Amman is affected the most prominent result of provocations relating to the city of Jerusalem and Al-Aqsa Mosque .
In measurements Jordanians also must rein in pursuit of some of the serious Israeli parties toward dispelling tactic approved by both President Mahmoud Abbas and King Abdullah II, when the first attended by more than a year to Amman him second memorandum authorizing the Hashemites manages the endowments of Jerusalem and Al-Aqsa Mosque.
Quite the day informed the Palestinian Minister of Awqaf, Hamoud al-Habash, a group of journalists at the time that the Palestinian Authority can not afford in the face of the Israeli enemy securing real protection of the holy places, and that Jordan is best able to provide this protection; thus justifying the Palestinian delegation politician who does not come practically nothing new; because Jordanian religious care provided under the Wadi Araba agreement.
"Habash," said Al-Aqsa Mosque, however, Jordan Secretariat would respond to their owners when a Palestinian state.
Today this protection, it is believed and widely, as a target, as well as the famous unwarranted mandate "Abbas" which also sparked controversy at the time and in parallel within the Jordan Enterprise, address the wisdom of delegating Palestinian acceptance within the concept of a strong balance for all.
Jordanian leadership risked cost, especially Al-Aqsa Mosque and care specifically for the Hashemites inherited through several stations.
In all cases officially believed in Amman today that Israel, or at least the radical parties to strike between now and then intentionally tendon mandate to care Jordanians. Goal in the final evaluation of the Jerusalem file for removal of any final settlement, and imposing facts on the ground may require even marginalized the role of the Jordanian partner in the peace process.
What is happening, according to a senior minister in the Jordanian government about two years ago, is the following: an extremist Zionist proposes in the Knesset literature proposal included the Temple Mount and the placement of the Al-Aqsa Mosque, or talking press Tel Aviv for projects to the exclusion of the Jordanian role; Vtltqt Jordanian Foreign Ministry letter, inquiring diplomatic ways documented and smooth; to get an official letter from the Government of Israel considers that the situation in the Al-Aqsa Mosque will remain as it is, and that will not change.
This happened in the year 2012 at least five times, at a time when external contact Nasser Judeh and Mohammad Momani minister went to confirm, and several times, that their government is following the details, and that it is inappropriate and appropriate response Jordanians only on the formal steps, on the basis that the entire file Jordan originally entrusted to care and orderly international agreements.
In this way, the Jordanian institution to respond to what is contained in the Israeli press, and refraining from going into details as long as the matter outside the formal scope.
The new thing is that this soft policy of containment and avoid confrontation and clash, and the test is no longer productive; because of the severe embarrassment, which affects the Jordanian state, not just the government, from behind tampering successive Aqsa Mosque specific file; and thus the Jordanian religious care file.
The scope of this embarrassment recently widened, and the level of provocative Israeli harassment does not reflect the operative those messages that arrive from the government of Benjamin Netanyahu, the content, and the opposition in the Jordanian street Actress Brotherhood Muslims, began to consider the attacks on Al-Aqsa Mosque argument against the Jordanian regime, and the question of allowing them to return to address the street and feelings also.
So it seems the official position in Jordan puzzled, especially since the Al-Aqsa Mosque from the red lines; Parliament in continuous mood to denounce Israel, and the pressure to normalize relations with the file, the Jordanian official and delays in the context no longer sufficient to meet the general atmosphere in the popular street, or to justify the shortcomings in the face of attacks Israeli violations.
Get it while the potential is still to respond to Israel's limited; The maximum Jordanian escalation on any subject related to Israel is to stop the normalization of diplomatic relations, and account diplomat, the provocations in the Al-Aqsa Mosque scale not yet reached the level allows the use of paper to stop normalization or freeze the Wadi Araba agreement .
From here, specifically, in this point, centered embarrassment and sensitivity of the situation; the government of Jordan can not stay in its current location itself if the Jordanian state discovered it outside the scope of influence in the Israeli position, at a time when Israel is suspended between the important parties in the Jordanian strategic balance, compared to the level of regional ignition and emotion.
Those paradox in sensitivity summit, political and security; Coping with extremism and the new demarcation of the area sectarian and Daash shifts in Iraq and Syria requires a precaution security survival of good relations with Israel, but recent exploit this circumstance, which is already learning that Oman restricted in the margins of maneuver against Tel Aviv.
The question at the end of this extraction is: Is the Jordanian decision-maker finds a way relieve him of the overall atmosphere of confrontation with Israel, without being allowed to change the reality in the Al-Aqsa Mosque; the sense of threat or threat of abolition of the Jordanian care?
Jordan Strategic complex: Israel "ally" against terrorism and "enemy" in the development of Al-Aqsa Mosque
Behind the curtain spin diplomatic and political battle is very sharp, and heated to a certain extent between Jordan and Israel, the primary objectives of the Tel Aviv entitled visible and invisible from behind the continuous tampering Jordanian most sensitive file, and headline religious jurisdiction over Al-Aqsa Mosque.
Throughout the past two weeks scrutinizes Jordan Enterprise in the information, looking for ratings and then answers relatively confused question now titled the justification and rationale for the Israeli tampering in the "Jordanian dish", this time where he learned Tel Aviv to Amman is affected the most prominent result of provocations relating to the city of Jerusalem and Al-Aqsa Mosque .
In measurements Jordanians also must rein in pursuit of some of the serious Israeli parties toward dispelling tactic approved by both President Mahmoud Abbas and King Abdullah II, when the first attended by more than a year to Amman him second memorandum authorizing the Hashemites manages the endowments of Jerusalem and Al-Aqsa Mosque.
Quite the day informed the Palestinian Minister of Awqaf, Hamoud al-Habash, a group of journalists at the time that the Palestinian Authority can not afford in the face of the Israeli enemy securing real protection of the holy places, and that Jordan is best able to provide this protection; thus justifying the Palestinian delegation politician who does not come practically nothing new; because Jordanian religious care provided under the Wadi Araba agreement.
"Habash," said Al-Aqsa Mosque, however, Jordan Secretariat would respond to their owners when a Palestinian state.
Today this protection, it is believed and widely, as a target, as well as the famous unwarranted mandate "Abbas" which also sparked controversy at the time and in parallel within the Jordan Enterprise, address the wisdom of delegating Palestinian acceptance within the concept of a strong balance for all.
Jordanian leadership risked cost, especially Al-Aqsa Mosque and care specifically for the Hashemites inherited through several stations.
In all cases officially believed in Amman today that Israel, or at least the radical parties to strike between now and then intentionally tendon mandate to care Jordanians. Goal in the final evaluation of the Jerusalem file for removal of any final settlement, and imposing facts on the ground may require even marginalized the role of the Jordanian partner in the peace process.
What is happening, according to a senior minister in the Jordanian government about two years ago, is the following: an extremist Zionist proposes in the Knesset literature proposal included the Temple Mount and the placement of the Al-Aqsa Mosque, or talking press Tel Aviv for projects to the exclusion of the Jordanian role; Vtltqt Jordanian Foreign Ministry letter, inquiring diplomatic ways documented and smooth; to get an official letter from the Government of Israel considers that the situation in the Al-Aqsa Mosque will remain as it is, and that will not change.
This happened in the year 2012 at least five times, at a time when external contact Nasser Judeh and Mohammad Momani minister went to confirm, and several times, that their government is following the details, and that it is inappropriate and appropriate response Jordanians only on the formal steps, on the basis that the entire file Jordan originally entrusted to care and orderly international agreements.
In this way, the Jordanian institution to respond to what is contained in the Israeli press, and refraining from going into details as long as the matter outside the formal scope.
The new thing is that this soft policy of containment and avoid confrontation and clash, and the test is no longer productive; because of the severe embarrassment, which affects the Jordanian state, not just the government, from behind tampering successive Aqsa Mosque specific file; and thus the Jordanian religious care file.
The scope of this embarrassment recently widened, and the level of provocative Israeli harassment does not reflect the operative those messages that arrive from the government of Benjamin Netanyahu, the content, and the opposition in the Jordanian street Actress Brotherhood Muslims, began to consider the attacks on Al-Aqsa Mosque argument against the Jordanian regime, and the question of allowing them to return to address the street and feelings also.
So it seems the official position in Jordan puzzled, especially since the Al-Aqsa Mosque from the red lines; Parliament in continuous mood to denounce Israel, and the pressure to normalize relations with the file, the Jordanian official and delays in the context no longer sufficient to meet the general atmosphere in the popular street, or to justify the shortcomings in the face of attacks Israeli violations.
Get it while the potential is still to respond to Israel's limited; The maximum Jordanian escalation on any subject related to Israel is to stop the normalization of diplomatic relations, and account diplomat, the provocations in the Al-Aqsa Mosque scale not yet reached the level allows the use of paper to stop normalization or freeze the Wadi Araba agreement .
From here, specifically, in this point, centered embarrassment and sensitivity of the situation; the government of Jordan can not stay in its current location itself if the Jordanian state discovered it outside the scope of influence in the Israeli position, at a time when Israel is suspended between the important parties in the Jordanian strategic balance, compared to the level of regional ignition and emotion.
Those paradox in sensitivity summit, political and security; Coping with extremism and the new demarcation of the area sectarian and Daash shifts in Iraq and Syria requires a precaution security survival of good relations with Israel, but recent exploit this circumstance, which is already learning that Oman restricted in the margins of maneuver against Tel Aviv.
The question at the end of this extraction is: Is the Jordanian decision-maker finds a way relieve him of the overall atmosphere of confrontation with Israel, without being allowed to change the reality in the Al-Aqsa Mosque; the sense of threat or threat of abolition of the Jordanian care?
كاتب الموضوع : اتقان بلوجر
اجعل مدونتك افضل مدونة مع التصاميم المجانية و الاضافات الجديدة و الدعم الفني المجاني فقط على منتديات اتقان بلوجر
0 التعليقات :
إرسال تعليق